Liquidation is often viewed as the last resort for distressed companies in Kenya. Governed primarily by the Insolvency Act, 2015, liquidation entails selling a company's assets to repay creditors. However, this process significantly disadvantages unsecured creditors, who often recover only a fraction of what they are owed. This article examines the Kenyan liquidation process, the plight of unsecured creditors, and the legal and economic shortcomings that exacerbate these challenges.
The Liquidation Process in Kenya
Liquidation in Kenya begins with a company being declared insolvent, either voluntarily by its directors or involuntarily through a court order. The appointed liquidator oversees the process, which involves:
- Asset Realization: The liquidator identifies and sells the company's assets.
- Creditor Ranking: Payments are distributed based on a predefined hierarchy:
- Secured creditors (e.g., banks with collateral) are paid first.
- Preferential creditors, including employees, follow.
- Unsecured creditors are last, often receiving minimal or no repayment.
- Company Dissolution: Once all assets are distributed, the company ceases to exist.
Challenges for Unsecured Creditors
Unsecured creditors are at the bottom of the repayment hierarchy, leading to significant disadvantages:
-
Limited Asset Recovery:
- By the time secured and preferential creditors are paid, little remains for unsecured creditors.
- High liquidation costs further erode available funds.
-
Prolonged Processes:
- Legal delays often devalue company assets over time, leaving unsecured creditors with reduced payouts.
- Prolonged disputes between stakeholders can exacerbate these delays.
-
Conflict of Interest:
- Secured creditors often influence liquidation decisions to prioritize their recovery.
- Unsecured creditors have limited avenues to challenge these decisions.
-
Insufficient Legal Protections:
- The Insolvency Act lacks robust mechanisms to safeguard unsecured creditors' interests.
- Courts are often slow to address disputes, allowing asset values to diminish during proceedings.
Case Studies Highlighting the Impact
Tuskys Supermarkets
Once a retail giant, Tuskys entered liquidation after failing to meet obligations to creditors. Secured creditors, such as banks, prioritized recovering loans, leaving suppliers and unsecured creditors largely unpaid.
Nakumatt Supermarkets
Similar to Tuskys, Nakumatt's liquidation saw secured creditors recover most of their claims, while unsecured creditors, including small suppliers, were left with heavy losses.
Legal and Economic Barriers
-
Rigid Insolvency Laws:
- Kenya’s Insolvency Act mirrors older legal systems focused on liquidation rather than restructuring.
- Flexible restructuring options, such as administration or pre-packaged sales, are underutilized.
-
Economic Instability:
- High inflation and a challenging business environment often lead to distressed companies having minimal assets of value.
- Liquidators face challenges in realizing fair market value for assets.
-
Complex Bureaucracy:
- Lengthy court procedures and regulatory hurdles delay resolutions.
- These inefficiencies lead to reduced payouts for all creditors, particularly unsecured ones.
Improving Outcomes for Unsecured Creditors
Kenya must prioritize reforms to address the imbalance in its liquidation process:
-
Enhanced Legal Framework:
- Introduce provisions that require secured creditors to set aside funds for unsecured creditors.
- Streamline court processes to expedite liquidation proceedings.
-
Focus on Restructuring:
- Encourage restructuring options over liquidation to preserve business value.
- Provide incentives for distressed companies to negotiate with all creditor classes.
-
Creditor Collaboration:
- Promote transparent communication and equitable agreements among all creditors.
- Strengthen the rights of unsecured creditors to challenge unfair liquidation practices.
